A whiff of espionage around the Epstein files points to how intelligence and influence interact
February 13, 2026 – 3:30 PM
Late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein appears with a woman, whose identity has been obscured, in this image from the Epstein estate released by House Oversight Committee Democrats in Washington, D.C., U.S., on December 18, 2025. (House Oversight Committee Democrats/Handout via Reuters)
How logistics industry experts plan to ‘move forward’ after COVID-19
Reasons why Filipinos love Korean culture and products
Why Batangas is the destination for budget-friendly family holidays
Epstein papers
have
thrown up speculation
Epstein is now better known for his sex trafficking network and Maxwell for stealing from his employees’ pension funds. But their examples point to how intelligence, high finance and influence work.
Generally speaking there are three main classes of people involved in state intelligence gathering. “Officers” are full-time employees of
state intelligence agencies such as MI6
. They run their groups of
“agents”
, who are not formally employed by the state but who deliberately and knowingly gather intelligence and perform tasks for intelligence officers. And there are what is known as
“intelligencers” (or sometimes assets)
who may not even know they are providing information to a spy agency.
The currency of human intelligence is access, knowledge and often the ability to compromise officials and influential people.
We often think that intelligence agencies and their agent runners
seek to directly recruit people
with the access and motivation to pass on state secrets. While this is undeniably the case – and the examples of the American
Aldrich Ames
and the Briton
Melita Norwood
provide good evidence of this – intelligence agencies are equally interested in recruiting what’s known as “access agents”.
Access agents
The value of an
access agent
Intelligence officers and their operatives require funding, mobility and a credible
back story
, sometimes
academics
It’s worth remembering that Kim Philby, the most notorious of the Cambridge spy ring, cut his teeth as a reporter in Spain during the civil war, before embarking on a career as an MI6 officer (and Soviet double agent). Australian journalist,
Richard Hughes
– who appeared lightly disguised in novels by Ian Fleming and John le Carre – was believed by many to be an agent for British intelligence, working in southeast Asia during the upheavals of the 1960s and 1970s.
Cyril Bertram Mills
Garbo
, one of the most successful double agents, who was instrumental in convincing Germany that the D-Day landings would be in Calais, not Normandy.
access agent
is trained “to be the friend the informant doesn’t have”. They can provide what their contact needs and cannot get hold of: whether that’s useful inside information of some kind, an introduction to someone important, a sexual partner or finance for one of their ventures.
MI5 is quite open about this
on its website
: “Agents operate by exploiting trusted relationships and positions to obtain sensitive information. They may also look for vulnerabilities among those handling secrets.
Secrets and lies
Determining truth in intelligence is complicated. Very rarely do we see a single piece of incontrovertible evidence that proves someone’s intelligence status or the ethics or efficacy of their actions. But then as we know, all of this is shrouded in secrecy and supposition.
In Maxwell’s case,
historical scholarship
TV documentaries
have provided unverified hints. In Epstein’s we have indicators such as the claim by former US attorney,
Alexander Acosta
Robert Dover
, Professor of Intelligence and National Security & Dean of Faculty,
University of Hull.
The Conversation
under a Creative Commons license. Read the
original article
TAGS
Epstein files
Ghislaine Maxwell
Jeffrey Epstein
Kim Philby
Robert Maxwell